翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Rowan Richards ・ Rowan Road, Hammersmith ・ Rowan Robertson ・ Rowan Sawers ・ Rowan Scarborough ・ Rowan Schlosberg ・ Rowan Sherriff ・ Rowan Smith ・ Rowan Software ・ Rowan steam railmotor ・ Rowan Taylor ・ Rowan Tink ・ Rowan Trollope ・ Rowan University ・ Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine ・ Rowan v. United States Post Office Department ・ Rowan Varty ・ Rowan Vine ・ Rowan Warfe ・ Rowan Williams ・ Rowan Woods ・ Rowan's Battle of Britain ・ Rowan's Creek ・ Rowan, Iowa ・ Rowan, Iran ・ Rowan-Salisbury School System ・ Rowanburn ・ Rowand ・ Rowanfield ・ Rowangchhari Upazila Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Rowan v. United States Post Office Department ： ウィキペディア英語版 Rowan v. United States Post Office Department (詳細は397 U.S. 728 (1970), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that an addressee of postal mail has unreviewable discretion to decide whether he wishes to receive further material from a particular sender, that the sender does not have a constitutional right to send unwanted material into someone’s home. It thus created a quasi-exception to free speech in cases where a person is held as a 'captive audience'.〔Eugene Volokh, ''(Freedom of Speech and Workplace Harassment )'', 39 UCLA Law Review 1791 (1992), excerpted with substantial modifications.〕 While the statute only explicitly applies to “a pandering advertisement which offers for sale matter which the addressee in his sole discretion believes to be erotically arousing or sexually provocative”, a lower court had found that § 4009 was constitutional when interpreted to prohibit advertisements similar to those initially mailed to the addressee, and this decision upholds that interpretation. In other words, a recipient may obtain a Prohibitory Order applying prohibiting mail from a given sender, and the mailing used as the basis for that order need not be erotic or sexually provocative in order to be the basis of prohibiting the sender from sending further mail. The only absolute requirement is that it must be possible to construe the mail as an offer to sell goods or services. ==Opinion of the Court== The opinion of the Court was delivered by Justice Warren Burger, and a concurring opinion was filed by Justice William Brennan, joined by William Douglas. The majority concluded that the addressee of postal mail has unreviewable discretion to decide whether to receive further material from a particular sender, and a vendor does not have a constitutional right to send unwanted material to an unreceptive addressee. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Rowan v. United States Post Office Department」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.